<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Je suis fondamentaliste</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.andrewtaylor.uk.net/je-suis-fondamentaliste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.andrewtaylor.uk.net/je-suis-fondamentaliste/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2020 11:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raju</title>
		<link>https://www.andrewtaylor.uk.net/je-suis-fondamentaliste/#comment-11534</link>
		<dc:creator>Raju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.andrewtaylor.uk.net/?p=463#comment-11534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Fundamentalist Freedom Defender
Are you trying to defend the indefensible?
Old Charlie was quietly pursuing the art of baiting the fundamentaliste and nobody gave him a sit -- until things went horribly wrong.
Of course, it&#039;s entirely another story that Charlie&#039;s style of freedom of expression would have landed them on the wrong side of the Patriot Act in the US of A. The wolves of Fox News would have torn the mag apart long ago.
And who are you to cast aspersions on good old Bibi&#039;s right to score a few brownie points when he took time out for Charlie&#039;s victims from his preoccupation building his home on the grave of others?

And graphically describing private scenes of endearment wouldn&#039;t earn you readership either. Try printing them, next time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Fundamentalist Freedom Defender<br />
Are you trying to defend the indefensible?<br />
Old Charlie was quietly pursuing the art of baiting the fundamentaliste and nobody gave him a sit &#8212; until things went horribly wrong.<br />
Of course, it&#8217;s entirely another story that Charlie&#8217;s style of freedom of expression would have landed them on the wrong side of the Patriot Act in the US of A. The wolves of Fox News would have torn the mag apart long ago.<br />
And who are you to cast aspersions on good old Bibi&#8217;s right to score a few brownie points when he took time out for Charlie&#8217;s victims from his preoccupation building his home on the grave of others?</p>
<p>And graphically describing private scenes of endearment wouldn&#8217;t earn you readership either. Try printing them, next time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
